Nice typo.. hardware = hard work .. thinking about my busted graphics card, sorry.
You can troll-rate me all you want, but you're doing it again. You responded to me by posting every positive ad that Hillary Clinton has ever run in Pennsylvania, and you're ignoring the ones she's running now, which is the entire point.
I was wrong before about 100% - I'll break it down further:
She's 100% negative in the Pittsburgh, Erie, Johnstown/Altoona, and Wilkes-Barre/Scranton markets - nearly half the state. She's only running the "I was very insulted by Barack Obama" ad.
In the Philadelphia and Harrisburg markets, she's only 50% negative - there's one positive ad: it totes her economic plans, and the other is negative: it's the "Barack Obama voted to give oil companies big tax breaks". That ad is not only negative but incorrect.
The ALP is also rolling out yet another negative ad, but no word on where it's going to air.
Obama doesn't have negative ads running, right?
The P/R stunt getting a former General to say that Hillary has no moral authority to place a wreath on a grave because of her Bosnia remarks was real positive, right? It didn't make a LIAR out of Barack when he swore that his campaign would only talk about this when asked, right?
The Harry & Louise style mailers trying to scare people out of wanting universal healthcare is real positive, right?
Give me a break. I never troll rate someone for disagreeing with me. I don't even mind if they insult me.
But for spewing crap you know is false - absolutely.
First you put the words from a sermon of Jeremiah Wright into the mouth of "the Obama campaign", then you link to Clinton ads that she's not running.
Everything I've written is completely factual and you troll-rate me for it.
One of the "negative ads" Clinton folks point to is entirely made up of quotes from PA newspaper editorials.
That doesn't excuse it. Are you that blinded by the Obama spin?
Are you saying as long as Hillary quoted other people saying critical things about Obama that it wouldn't be negative?
Laughable.
The point is that newspaper editorial boards (not to mention voters and superdelegates) disproportionately think Clinton is the one who has been more negative.
I'm sure you Clinton folks sincerely think Obama has been more negative, but most folks, including people who were uncommitted earlier, disagree with you.
Jeremiah Wright was a National Adviser to the campaign when he made those statements. The fact that he was speaking for the campaign from the pulpit is the reason his church is currently under investigation for tax fraud - it violated their non-profit purpose according to IRS rules.
Hopefully (and likely) the church will be fine.
But, even though Obama claims to have "disowned" Wright during the debate, you cannot pretend he was not working for the campaign at the time.
but you seriously believe this...
lol
you don't seem to know what you are talking about. feel free to provide evidence that wright was "a National Adviser" right after 9-11.
moreover, your lies continue on who and why the ucc is being investigated by the irs. trinity ucc -- wright's church -- is not being investigated by the irs, the ucc is.
feel free to show that wright was "working" for the campaign, meaning drawing a paycheck from it. if you meant that he was volunteering for the campaign, that's fine. but the other statements were clearly and intentional deceptive, and you obviously know better. pretty disgusting, if you asked me...
I troll rate you because you say things that you know are false, and that add nothing to the conversation - in short, because you're trolling.
TR abuse.
No shit. Thanks.
